Reader's Digest: Unlock secrets to cracking the CLAT Logical Reasoning section like a pro! Read on in this treasure trove to find the best of CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips, which would make your brain work like a well-oiled machine.

Are you a law aspirant gearing up for CLAT 2025? Logical Reasoning can make or break your chances of cracking the exam because it holds almost 20% weightage. 
This section relies on your power to reason inductively and deductively, not on external knowledge—your foundations in the logic matter here.

Remembering the concepts is not enough to pass this section; you must thoroughly answer each question. Understanding how to solve each question quickly will help you save time on the exam and give you the best chance to score well.

Download Most Important Questions of Logical reasoning for CLAT

Here, we have answered the common queries of students like you on CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips:

• What is logical reasoning in CLAT? The logical reasoning section tests your ability to understand complex arguments, recognize patterns and relationships, and draw logical inferences from given information. 
• What is the best way to start preparing for CLAT Logical Reasoning? Begin by familiarizing yourself with the types of questions asked in CLAT question papers and practising solving them.
• How much time should I allocate for CLAT Logical Reasoning preparation? You must plan your preparation diligently and learn to crack this section with a high score, curiosity, and fun. Try to allocate at least one hour daily to prepare the logical reasoning section in your daily CLAT study plan.
• What are the key areas to focus on while preparing for Logical Reasoning? Analytical and critical reasoning are the key areas of focus in CLAT.
• How many questions are asked from the logical reasoning section of CLAT? This section comprises 22-26 questions from comprehension-based passages, which test your ability to analyze and evaluate arguments, identify logical patterns, and draw conclusions.

The following video, brought to you by Legal Edge, the leading name in the industry, guides you through the various learning from the CLAT 2025 session.

CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips 2025: Important Topics  

Before starting the preparation, getting an idea about the important topics for the CLAT logical reasoning section from the exam point of view is essential.

The syllabus for logical reasoning includes various questions based on verbal reasoning, such as syllogism, analogies, logical sequence, blood relation, etc. 

1. Critical Reasoning: Questions that require you to evaluate arguments, identify assumptions, find conclusions, and assess the strength or weakness of an argument.

2. Syllogisms: Problems involving statements and conclusions, where you need to determine whether a given conclusion logically follows from the given premises.

3. Logical Connectives: Questions that involve statements connected by logical operators like "and," "or," "not," "if-then," and "if and only if."

4. Statement-Assumption: Questions that ask you to identify assumptions made in a given statement.

5. Statement-Conclusion: Problems where you need to determine whether a given conclusion can be logically drawn from the provided statements.

6. Statement-Course of Action: Questions that require you to identify the most appropriate course of action based on a given situation or set of statements.

7. Analogy: Questions that test your ability to identify relationships between pairs of words or phrases and apply these relationships to solve new problems.

8. Number Series: Problems that involve finding the pattern in a series of numbers and predicting the next number in the sequence.

9. Coding-Decoding: Questions that involve encoding or decoding messages based on specific rules or patterns.

10. Blood Relations: Problems that test your ability to determine family relationships based on given information.

11. Directions and Distances: Questions that assess your spatial reasoning skills by providing directions or distances between locations.

12. Order and Ranking: Problems that involve arranging items or individuals in a specific order or ranking based on given conditions.

13. Venn Diagrams: Questions that require you to use Venn diagrams to visualize and solve problems related to sets and categories.

14. Logical Games and Puzzles: These may include chessboard problems, seating arrangements, or scheduling problems that require logical reasoning and problem-solving.

15. Assumption-Premise-Conclusion: Questions that involve identifying the assumptions, premises, and conclusions in a given argument.

16. Analytical Reasoning: Questions that involve solving puzzles, such as seating arrangements, scheduling, or grouping problems.

17. Data Sufficiency: Problems that assess your ability to determine whether the given data is sufficient to answer a particular question.

18. Logical Deductions: Questions that require making logical deductions based on a set of rules or conditions.

19. Inferences: Problems where you need to draw inferences from the given information or statements.

20. Decision-Making: Questions that ask you to make decisions based on a given set of criteria or conditions.

How to Prepare Logical Reasoning for CLAT 2025?

You can easily ace this section with enough practice and a clear understanding of the theoretical concepts. However, it is recommended that you put some extra effort into it, as it is one of the most time-consuming sections of the exam.

The following are some of the best CLAT Logical Reasoning preparation tips for helping you score well on the upcoming exam.

Know Thy Enemy: Familiarize Yourself with the CLAT Syllabus

• Understanding the scope and structure of the CLAT Logical Reasoning section is crucial.
• Familiarize yourself with the syllabus and exam pattern of CLAT to identify key topics and potential question types.
• Identify areas and contexts where you are incorrect with your answers so you can pick out your faults and rectify them.

Strategize and Conquer: Create a Systematic Study Plan

• Success in the Logical Reasoning section determines how well you manage your time and resources.
• Design a personalized and detailed study plan to optimize your preparation.
• Allocate specific time for each topic, practice sessions, and regular revisions.
• Remember to set realistic goals and track your progress.
• Also, try to solve as many puzzle-related questions as possible that demand logic regularly to improve your logical skills.

Read More: Short Tricks to Enhance your CLAT GK Preparation

More is Less: Master the Art of Puzzles & Games and build a reading habit.

• The Logical Reasoning section of the CLAT exam features various question types, such as syllogisms, blood relations, directions, and seating arrangements.
• Familiarizing yourself with these question types and their corresponding problem-solving strategies will help you confidently approach the exam.
• RS Aggarwal AR Book will help with puzzles.
• Incorporate puzzles and games like Sudoku, crosswords, and logic puzzles into your daily routine.
• For critical reasoning, build a habit of reading editorials. Learn to analyse them and understand the author's opinion critically.
• Practice solving different question types and develop customized strategies to tackle them effectively.
• They help sharpen your problem-solving skills, pattern recognition, and critical thinking.

Take Free Demo Class for CLAT Logical Reasoning

Find the Bhrammastra: The Right Book 

• Referring to only one good book instead of many is always recommended, as it may need clarification.
• Find one good book that will best prepare you for the logical reasoning section, help you understand the topics, and solve the question papers.
• You can refer to the following CLAT Preparation Books while preparing for the exam:
• 501 challenging Logical Reasoning Practice Book
• Universal's Logical Reasoning for CLAT, LSAT, and Other Law Entrance Exams by Jain Prateek
• Verbal Reasoning and Non-Verbal Reasoning by RS Aggarwal
• GMAT Official Guide

• Level Up Boredom: Make Studying Fun

• If you enjoy challenges, then the logical reasoning section is definitely for you!
• Once you get the main point of the particular question, you can solve the question rather quickly and even try more challenging questions.
• Since this section relies solely on your ability to understand the passage's logic, it can be interesting for you to solve more questions quickly.

• Kickstart: Start with Basics

  If you are new to logical Reasoning, begin with the basics. Understand fundamental concepts and logical reasoning principles before moving on to more complex problems.

  Practice Makes Perfect: Solve Previous Year Papers & Mock Tests

• The more you practice, the better you'll identify patterns, draw logical conclusions, and solve problems quickly.
• Allocate ample practice time, and ensure you cover various question types.
• Solve previous years' papers and mock tests to familiarize yourself with the exam's time constraints and build confidence.
• Analyze your performance to identify strengths and weaknesses, and tweak your preparation accordingly.
• Attempting mock tests will help improve your time management skills and speed in the final exam.
• Also, CLAT Mock Tests will help you understand the difficulty level of the exam and the type of questions asked in this section.
• Once you complete each topic per the logical reasoning syllabus for CLAT, try to attempt as many mock tests as possible. It will help build your confidence levels.
• Additionally, maintain a record of your progress to monitor your improvement and identify areas that need more attention.
• Practising mocks, topic tests and sectional tests will only yield results if and when you spend time with the solved paper after working on it.
• Sit with the paper and check where you went wrong, whether it was a silly, comprehension, or interpretation error.

• We all make mistakes: Analyze them

  Review and analyze your mistakes carefully. Understand why you got a particular question wrong and learn from those errors. This will help you avoid making the same mistakes in the future.

  Build the foundation: Develop Logical Thinking 

  Improve your critical thinking and logical reasoning skills by engaging in activities that require analytical thinking. Read opinion pieces, debates, and argumentative essays to develop your ability to evaluate arguments.

  Shortcut to Success: Learn Shortcuts

• Employing shortcuts and strategies can significantly reduce your time on each question, giving you an edge over others.
• Learn various tips and tricks, such as identifying patterns in number series, using Venn diagrams for syllogisms, and eliminating incorrect options using logic.
• Develop time-saving techniques like elimination, substitution, and approximation to answer questions quickly and accurately.
• Incorporate these strategies into your practice sessions to improve your speed and accuracy.
• The faster you solve, the more time you have for challenging questions.

• Stay Cool Under Pressure: Practice Time Management

• Time management is crucial for the CLAT exam, especially in the Logical Reasoning section.
• Allocate a specific amount of time for each question and aim to solve it within that time frame.
• Speed and accuracy are vital, so practice solving questions under timed conditions to enhance your time management skills.
• It is imperative to check on time while attempting the logical reasoning section. This way, you will know how long it takes you to solve each question.
• Learn time management tips for CLAT and easy techniques to solve logical reasoning questions. This will help you solve tricky questions quickly in the exam.
• Additionally, develop the habit of quickly scanning the question paper and identifying more straightforward questions to tackle first, saving more complex questions for later.
• If a question seems tricky, skip it. Do not think it over, as it can waste time.

CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips 2025  

1. Familiarize yourself with the CLAT 2025 exam pattern, including the number of questions, marking scheme, and time allocated for the logical reasoning section. Knowing what to expect will help you plan your strategy.

2. Start with the basics of logical reasoning. Understand the types of questions, logical principles, and common patterns in CLAT. Develop a clear understanding of concepts before attempting more complex problems.
3. Consistent practice is essential. Solve a wide variety of logical reasoning questions from different sources, including previous CLAT papers and reputable CLAT preparation books. Aim for daily practice sessions to build proficiency. Diversifying your practice will help you handle any question that comes your way.
4. Take CLAT mock tests regularly to simulate the actual exam environment. If available, use official CLAT mock tests or opt for high-quality mock tests from trusted sources. These tests will help you gauge your progress and identify areas for improvement.
5. Time Management: Practice time management during mock tests and practice sessions. Allocate a specific amount of time to each question and stick to it. If you get stuck on a question, move on and return to it later if time allows.
6. Focus on understanding the underlying logic behind each question. Don't just memorize solutions, but try to comprehend the reasoning process. This will help you tackle similar questions more effectively.
7. Review your practice tests and analyze your mistakes. Understand why you got a particular question wrong and learn from your mistakes. Note common patterns in your mistakes and work on those areas.
8. Read opinion pieces, debates, and logical arguments from newspapers, magazines, and online sources. This will improve your ability to evaluate arguments, a valuable skill for logical reasoning critically.
9. Keep a journal to track your progress. Record the types of questions you excel at and those that challenge you the most. Use this information to customize your study plan.

Don't Miss: Short Tricks to Enhance your Legal Aptitude Preparation for CLAT

What types of Questions are Asked in the CLAT Logical Reasoning Section 2025?

The Logical Reasoning section of CLAT will consist of passages that will be within 450 words. This passage will be followed by more than one question and scored accordingly.

• These questions will allow you to recognize, understand, and conclude an argument;
• Diagnose the arguments in the passage;
• A critical assessment of reasoning, along with the analysis of how the conclusions can alter, depends on specific evidence;
• Deduce inferences from the passage and apply them to different situations;
• Identification of equivalence and contradictions, inferring analogies and relationships and analyzing the efficacy of arguments.

Read Here: Best Books For CLAT Preparation 2025

How to Attempt CLAT Logical Reasoning Questions 2025?

You can attempt the Logical Reasoning questions of CLAT in several ways. Try to follow these quick CLAT Logical Reasoning preparation tips to answer questions quickly:

• It is essential to recognize the conclusions and premises in a particular passage. These conclusions and assumptions make up the arguments, and identifying them will help you proceed.
• The next step is to determine the tone or theme of the passage. You can answer the questions that follow the passage by checking the tonality.
• If you have successfully decoded the theme or the point of the passage, then it will be easy for you to choose the answers.
• It is also very essential to understand the view of the passage. The passage may have more than one view, which can be contradictory.
• You must identify and segregate them, and this will aid you in realizing if the passage has a central point or several viewpoints.
• Reading the question precisely is a skill you must enhance, figure out the fine details, and answer accordingly.
• The word 'most' in the questions signifies that you must pick an answer that best suits the question. It is essential to read without any distractions and pauses.
• It is essential to follow the question minutely and leave whatever prior knowledge you have of it behind. The question makers know this hesitation that might cross your mind. They are intended to test your adapting skills and ability to soak in new facts and act accordingly without imposing previous knowledge.

A question regarding the implication of a particular statement in a passage may be given. In this case, two things need to be done: assess what the statement implies explicitly and implicitly.

You must assess and deduce all possible arguments for the statement from different views. Identifying the theme or the point will be beneficial while attempting these questions.

Read Here: Short Tricks to Score 150 Marks in CLAT

CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips 2025: Sample Questions

Solving CLAT Mock Tests will help you understand the difficulty level and the type of questions asked in the exam.

To help you understand the type of questions asked in the exam, we have provided analytical reasoning questions for the upcoming exam here.

Q1. Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India's Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy provided opportunities for many more players to enter the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players can move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. Therefore, he decided not to select players from the previous World Cup for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad.

 1.1 As stated above, which of the following statements is consistent with Dravid's 2018 Under-19 World Cup selection strategy?  

(a) Selecting an inexperienced team at the under-19 level ensures failure, and players who experience failure learn to be humble.

(b) Playing a sport is more important than winning or losing.

(c) The Under-19 World Cup is a stepping-stone to first-class cricket; winning it should not be the end goal.

(d) When players are under 19, they do not feel stressed about playing at a World Cup; however, as they age, their ability to play well depends on the number of matches they have already played.

Don't Miss: How to Score 25+ in English for CLAT Preparation 2025

1.2 What is the most desirable outcome of Dravid's selection strategy from his perspective? 

(a) The team loses the World Cup, but 5 players from the squad go on to play first-class cricket.

(b) The team winning the World Cup and 1 player getting selected for the national team.

(c) The team winning the World Cup, and no player getting selected for the next Under-19 World Cup team.

(d) The team winning the World Cup, and 5 players from the squad going on to play first-class cricket.

1.3   Which of the following statements, if true, contradicts Dravid's selection strategy? 

(a) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on the win-loss ratio of the team they were a part of.

(b) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their ability to cope with injuries.

(c) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their individual performances.

(d) Players who have played in international tournaments face domestic competition better than those who have not.

Q2. Gayatri: Maharana Pratap was courageous, no doubt, but his forces were lost to the forces of Emperor Akbar the Great in the Battle of Haldighati. The king of a region such as Mewar and the Emperor of most of the Indian sub-continent at the time cannot both be eligible for the title 'the Great', given the historical context.

Ranjini: Pratap never surrendered to Akbar in his lifetime despite Akbar sending several envoys to his great rival to make him a Mughal ally. Pratap's defiance gave other Rajput rulers the courage to refuse alliance with Akbar. The victory in the Battle of Haldighati was a hollow victory for Akbar at best. Pratap's forces were outnumbered by Akbar's by far in the battle, but Pratap escaped with his life and recovered much of the territory lost. Maharana Pratap the Great was recognised by Emperor Akbar the Great. The latter is known to have wept on hearing the news of his rival's death.

2.1 In support of which of the following does Gayatri state the fact that Maharana Pratap's forces lost to the forces of Emperor Akbar the Great?

(a) Maharana Pratap was not courageous

(b) Mewar is a smaller region in comparison to the Indian sub-continent

(c) Maharana Pratap does not deserve the title 'the Great

(d)  Akbar defeated Pratap in the battle

2.2 Ranjini's statement that Pratap subsequently recovered much of the territory lost in the battle plays which one of the following roles?

(a) Forms the conclusion of ranjini's argument that Pratap was courageous

(b) Forms a premise for Rajini's argument that Pratap does not deserve the title the Great

(c) Offers a clarification on who won the battle between the forces of Akbar and Pratap

(d) Forms a premise for Rajini's argument that the outcome of the battle of Haldighati was not of much consequence

Know More: Important Critical Reasoning Questions for CLAT

2.3 Which of the following is the main conclusion of Ranjini's statements?

(a) Pratap also deserves the title 'the Great'.

(b) Akbar does not deserve the title 'the Great'.

(c) Akbar had no rival greater than Pratap

(d) Pratap did not care about the outcome of the Battle of Haldighati

2.4 The patterns of reasoning in Gayatri's argument closely resemble those in all of the following except?

(a) Sir Donald Bradman is the greatest batsman to have ever played Test cricket. Sachin Tendulkar was hugely successful against most bowling attacks. Still, his batting average of 53.78 in test matches disqualifies him from holding the same status in Test cricket as Sir Bradman, who averaged 99.9.

(b) Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer are the greatest tennis players ever. While Nadal has a better record against Federer when they have played against each other, Federer has won more grand slams.

(c) There can be no dispute about Diego Maradona's legendary football skills. Still, in terms of international football, he cannot be compared with Pele because Pele scored 77 goals in 92 matches, whereas Maradona only managed 34 goals in 91 matches.

(d) It is true that Maria Sharapova is a fierce competitor and has had a storied career in international tennis. However, with Serena Williams' 19-2 head-to-head lead over Maria Sharapova, Serena is the most dominant woman to have played tennis. Maria Sharapova has done nothing to threaten that domination.

Attempt FREE CLAT Logical Reasoning Quiz

Illustration Question Set

Q1. In South Asia, the ruling classes ignore the quotidian at their own peril. Just ask them about onions. This autumn, the humble bulb has challenged the titans. The trouble began when unseasonably heavy rains followed drought across the onion-growing belt of north and central India. That not only destroyed the crop; the wet caused more than a third of the onions in storage to rot. The result is a severe shortage of onions across India, with more than tripling prices. This hardly threatens famine – something the green revolution abolished decades ago by boosting wheat and rice yields.

Yet remove the onion, and you struggle to imagine Indian cuisine. It forms the base for curries and biryanis. When a poor Indian has nothing else to eat, at least she has an onion with a chapati or two. In late September, the Indian government slapped a ban on exports of onions. That briefly brought down prices, helping consumers. But it has angered farmers and exporters in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka, for whom onions are an essential cash crop.

There are international implications in South Asia, a region riven by geopolitical fault lines. Upon hearing of India's export ban, Bangladesh's strong woman, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, admonished the Indian government for giving no warning. Her country counts on Indian onions, whose price at one point had risen fivefold in the markets of Dhaka, Bangladesh's capital. [Extracted, with edits and revisions, from "Banyan: Tight bulb moment", The Economist, Vol. 433, No. 9172, December 7, 2019.]

1.1 Which of the following forms the premise for the author's argument that a shortage of onions would not cause a famine in India today?

(a) India can ban onion exports, ensuring adequate supply.

(b) India can always import onions from its neighbouring countries.

(c) Onions are only used for flavour in Indian cuisine and are not the main staple.

(d) There are enough wheat and rice for people to eat in India today because of the green revolution.

(Answer: (d))

Rationale: The correct answer is (d) – there is enough wheat and rice for people to eat in India today because of the green revolution. The author states this towards the beginning of the third paragraph.

While each of the other options may be true, the author does not base the conclusion that a shortage of onions would not cause a famine in India today on any of the statements set out in the other options. Therefore, none of (a), (b), or (c) can be the correct answer.

1.2 Which of the following is most likely to be true had heavy rains not followed drought across the onion-growing regions of India?

(a) Bangladesh would not have needed to import onions from India.

(b) India would not have had a shortage of onions.

(c) The onion harvest in storage would not have rotted.

(d) The onion crop would not have been destroyed.

(Answer: (c))

Rationale: The correct answer is (c) – the onion harvest in storage would not have rotted. We can infer this from the author's statement that "the wet caused more than a third of onions in storage to rot".

Nothing in the passage indicates that Bangladesh would not have needed to import onions from India had the rains not followed the drought, so (a) cannot be the correct answer.

The heavy rains and the preceding drought caused a shortage of onions (and not either of these reasons alone), so (b) cannot be the correct answer. The draught, not the rains, destroyed the onion crop, so (d) cannot be the correct answer either.

Read More: Short Tricks to Clear CLAT Exam in 10 Days

1.3 Which of the following can we infer from the passage above?

(a) Farmers in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka do not mind receiving lower prices from selling onions to ensure an adequate supply in India.

(b) Farmers in states other than Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka do not cultivate onions.

(c) Farmers in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka have been forced to cultivate onions because of the policies of the Indian government.

(d) Farmers in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Karnataka care more about earning money through selling onions than ensuring an adequate supply in India.

(Answer: (d))

Rationale: The correct answer is (d) – farmers in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Karnataka care more about earning money through exporting onions than ensuring an adequate supply of onions in India.

We can infer this because of the author's statement about how the ban on the export of onions brought down prices but angered farmers in these states, who view onions as an important cash crop.

Since option (a) directly contradicts this statement, (a) cannot be the correct answer. There is nothing in the passage to support either (b) or (c), and so, neither of these can be the correct answer.

Read More: Short Tricks to Clear CLAT Exam in 10 Days

1.4 Which of the following solutions, if employed by the Bangladesh government, would counter the effect of the ban on onion exports by India on the prices of onions in Dhaka's markets?

(a) Prohibit onion cultivation in Bangladesh

(b) Increase imports of onions from other countries

(c) Close the market on alternate days

(d) None of the above

(Answer: (b))

Rationale: The correct answer is (b) – increase imports of onions from other countries. The price of onions would reduce with an increase in their supply.

Option (a) would have the opposite effect; it would reduce supply, so (a) cannot be the correct answer. Option (c) would not affect the supply or demand for onions, so this cannot be the correct answer. Since (b) is likely to counter the ban's effect, (d) cannot be the correct answer for the reasons discussed.

1.5 Which of the following point most accurately express the passage's main point?

(a) Onions are not an important crop for India or Bangladesh.

(b) The Bangladeshi government habitually opposes India's export policies, and the ban on onion exports is the most recent example of such opposition.

(c) Adverse weather has affected the availability of onions in India, leading to cascading effects, including in neighbouring countries.

(d) Onions form a very important part of India's diet, and in the absence of anything else, an Indian can always eat onions with chapatis.

(Answer: (c))

Rationale: The correct answer is (c) - adverse weather has affected the availability of onions in India, leading to cascading effects, including in neighbouring countries. The author discusses the reason for the shortage of onions in India, how the government's ban on exports affected farmers and exporters in India, the impact on the prices of onions in Bangladesh, and the government's reaction to Bangladesh the ban.

Since option (c) is the only option that addresses all these points, it is the correct answer. Option (a) contradicts the author's description of how important onions are to an Indian's diet and cannot be the correct answer.

There is nothing to indicate that the Bangladeshi government habitually opposes India's export policies – the only instance we hear of their opposition to the ban on the export of on, and so, (b) cannot be the correct answer. While (d) may be true, it only touches upon one of the points the author discusses in the passage rather than expressing the author's main point, so (d) cannot be the correct answer.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a strong command of logical reasoning is critical to succeeding in CLAT, and the tips mentioned above can help you streamline your preparation and boost your confidence. Not only with this particular section but building strong foundations in logic will help you in all reading-based sections. Here are the key-takeaways:

1. Understanding Logical Reasoning: CLAT Logical Reasoning tests your ability to understand complex arguments, recognize patterns, and draw logical inferences.

2. Start with the Basics: Begin your preparation by understanding the fundamentals of logical reasoning and the different question types.

3. Time Management: Allocate sufficient time for daily preparation and practice. Efficient time management is crucial during the CLAT exam.

4. Diversify Practice: Practice a wide variety of logical reasoning question types to become proficient in handling different scenarios.

5. Solve Mock Tests: Regularly take CLAT mock tests to simulate exam conditions, assess your progress, and work on time management.

6. Analyze Mistakes: Carefully analyze your mistakes to understand where you went wrong and improve your problem-solving skills.

By implementing these strategies and practising regularly, you can build a solid foundation in logical reasoning and increase your chances of acing the CLAT exam. So, prepare today and give yourself the best shot at a bright legal career!

“We generate fears while we do nothing. We overcome these fears by taking action.”